On May 9, the Department of Labor released it’s very first app, called the DOL-Timesheet (take a closer look here). Available in English and Spanish, the app is designed to allow its users (employees) to track their hours worked, breaks, and overtime (at the apps fixed rate of 1.5 times the regular rate of pay). It then generates an excel file or “timesheet” of the user’s work week, which the user can email to an employer, manager, or anyone in the user’s contact list. Also included in the app is a “Contact Us” section which includes the DOL’s phone number, a link to email them with a question or issue, and a link to help locate the nearest DOL office. Here’s where I start to raise some questions.
A while back I mentioned that the DOL had formed an alliance of sorts with the American Bar Association. Under this partnership, a certain number of individuals with “unresolved complaints” are provided with a toll-free number connecting them to a nationwide pool of American Bar Association Lawyers who are experienced in employment-related issues. This relationship was created because the DOL lacked the resources to deal with the annual number of complaints it receives. Eyebrow raised yet? Mine is, and with good reason.
In all likelihood, this application will only increase the number of complaints the DOL receives. If the DOL can’t handle the existing number of complaints it receives, why would they make it easier for individuals to file them? And more importantly, on whose desk would these additional complaints land? The DOL’s or the American Bar Association? Even though the app states in it’s disclosures that “the conclusions reached by this App rely on the accuracy of the data provided by the user”, there’s still cause for concern.
For arguments sake, let’s say an employee sends a message to the DOL disputing his payroll. Then let’s say the DOL refers them to the ABA. Does the ABA Attorney review the situation, make a few phone calls, on a pro bono basis nonetheless, to determine if a claim exists? Or, does the Attorney send a letter of representation and offer of settlement to the employer? I realize we’re dealing in hypotheticals, but one has to wonder, is this just the beginning?
The bottom line is, the Department of Labor is embracing automation. Employers would be well served to do the same. The best way to protect yourself is with on-line compliance training and testing. It’s simple, fast, and gives you an affirmative defense.
Let us know how we can help your company prepare for the worst. Visit HRFix to learn more.
News & Notes – Volume 4: Paycheck Fairness Act is Back, What Laws Apply to Me, & City of Criminal Love
June 8, 20111. Paycheck Fairness Act Update
In 2009, the Paycheck Fairness Act was passed by the House, then defeated by the Senate a year later. However, the bill has now been reintroduced in Congress. It’s designed to alter key provisions of the Equal Pay act of 1963, creating more compliance challenges for employers. Among other things, this legislation would:
2. How Big is Big Enough?
One of our most frequently asked questions from clients and small business owners is “Which laws apply to me?” While many Federal employment laws apply to all employers, here are the thresholds for seven major employment laws:
3. City of Criminal Love?
Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter recently signed an ordinance that prohibits public and private employers within the city from conducting a job applicant’s criminal background check until after the first employment interview. The ordinance notes that “approximately one-fifth of Philadelphia’s population has some type of criminal record (not including their football team).” The legislation’s stated intent is “to give the individual with a criminal record an opportunity to be judged on his or her own merit during the submission of the application and at least until the completion of one interview.”
The ordinance prohibits employers from “making any inquiries or gathering any information” regarding criminal convictions before completion of the first interview. If the applicant voluntarily discloses such information during an interview, the employer may then discuss only the volunteered information. If an employer does not conduct an interview, no inquiry may be made into the applicant’s criminal history.
“It’s already difficult for ex-offenders to get their foot in the door and obtain employment following incarceration,” said Mayor Nutter. “This bill makes it a little easier to be considered for a job without harmful preconceptions by an employer.” Philadelphia is the first city in the commonwealth to enact this legislation for both public and private employers.
One wonders if Mayor Nutter has taken the hard costs of recruiting and interviewing into consideration. This step just means the employer has to interview more candidates to fill certain positions. Employers’ have a right to know who they’re hiring, and now that right is being challenged. These days, it seems Employers continue to find themselves being squeezed into more difficult positions.
Tags: ADA, ADEA, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Americans with Disabilities Act, Background Checks, City of Philidelphia Background Check Restriction, COBRA, Compliance, Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, Equal Pay act of 1963, Family and Medical Leave Act, FMLA, HR, hrfix, hrfix.com, Mayor Michael Nutter, Paycheck Fairness Act, PDA, Title VII, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, WARN, web-based compliance training, Web-based HR Training, Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act
Posted in Commentary, Consultative | Leave a Comment »